Three-dimensional numerical simulation, sensitivity analysis, and practical implications for crude oil pipeline flow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/scimundi.maths.6.2.22Keywords:
Bend losses, crude oil pipeline, finite element methodAbstract
This paper presents comprehensive three-dimensional numerical simulations of crude oil flow in pipelines using the finite element method to investigate the effects of inlet velocity, fluid viscosity, pipe diameter, and bend curvature on flow behavior and energy consumption. The validated Navier–Stokes solver with k-epsilon turbulence model is employed. Results show that pressure drop increases linearly with velocity in laminar flow and as U^1.75 in turbulent flow; doubling velocity increases pumping power by a factor of 6.4. Bitumen (μ = 0.5 Pa·s) experiences 43 times higher pressure drop than light crude (μ = 0.001 Pa·s) at the same flow rate. Pressure drop scales as D^-5 at constant flow rate; increasing diameter from 0.5 m to 0.8 m reduces annual energy costs by 94%. Long-radius bends (Rc/D ≥ 3) reduce bend losses by 50–60% compared to short-radius bends, following the correlation K = 0.21(Rc/D)^-0.5. Sensitivity analysis identifies inlet velocity as the most influential parameter (SU = 1.78), and uncertainty quantification yields a combined uncertainty of ±15.3% in pressure drop predictions. These findings provide quantitative guidance for pipeline design, operation, and cost optimization.
Downloads
References
Batchelor, G. K. (1967). An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800955.
Beggs, H. D. (2003). Pipeline Planning and Construction Field Manual. Elsevier.
Brezzi, F., & Fortin, M. (1991). Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3172-1.
Brill, J. P., & Mukherjee, H. (1999). Multiphase Flow in Wells. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Crane Company. (1988). Flow of Fluids Through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe. Technical Paper No. 410.
Crank, J., & Nicolson, P. (1947). A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 43(1), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100023197.
Ferziger, J. H., Perić, M., & Street, R. L. (2020). Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics (4th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99693-6.
Kenya Ministry of Energy and Petroleum. (2023). National Oil and Gas Policy Review. Government of Kenya.
Launder, B. E., & Spalding, D. B. (1972). Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence. Academic Press.
Layton, W. J. (2008). Introduction to the Numerical Analysis of Incompressible Viscous Flows. SIAM. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718904.
Logg, A., Mardal, K. A., & Wells, G. (Eds.). (2012). Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8.
Quarteroni, A., & Valli, A. (1994). Numerical Approximation of Partial Differential Equations. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85268-1.
Schlichting, H., & Gersten, K. (2016). Boundary-Layer Theory (9th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52919-5.
Taylor, C., & Hood, P. (1973). A numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations using the finite element technique. Computers & Fluids, 1(1), 73-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(73)90027-3.
Temam, R. (1984). Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis. North-Holland.
White, F. M. (2006). Viscous Fluid Flow (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
White, F. M. (2016). Fluid Mechanics (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarah Khaindi Wandabwa, David Angwenyi, Frankline Tireito

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








