Integrating artificial intelligence [AI] into music education: student teachers' engagement, attitudes and perceptions at methodist college of education, Akyem Asene-Aboabo, Oda, Ghana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/scimundi.6.2.43Palavras-chave:
Academic Assignments, Akyem Asene-Aboabo, Artificial Intelligence, Ghana, Music Education, Oda, Student Perceptions, Teacher EducationResumo
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are rapidly reshaping academic work in teacher training institutions, yet empirical evidence regarding their application within domain-specific practical fields like music education remains sparse in sub-Saharan Africa. This study examined student teachers' utilisation patterns and perceptions of AI tools in music course assignments at Methodist College of Education, Akyem Asene-Aboabo, Oda, in the Eastern Region of Ghana. Anchored in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Diffusion of Innovations theory, the study adopted a quantitative descriptive survey design. A sample of 25 student teachers across levels 200 to 400 was selected via simple random sampling from a total population of 49 music education students; 24 fully completed questionnaires were retrieved (96% response rate). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations). The findings revealed high baseline AI awareness (Grand Mean = 4.24, SD = 0.63) and strong positive perceptions regarding AI's capacity to enhance academic productivity, task comprehension, and lesson planning (Composite Mean = 4.22, SD = 0.61). ChatGPT, Grammarly and Gemini emerged as the primary tools used for information retrieval, text refinement and idea generation. However, reliance on AI raised concerns regarding reduced creative independence, diminished musical originality and infrastructural challenges such as unreliable internet access. The study concludes that while AI serves as an effective academic scaffold, its unchecked use threatens authentic musical creation and pedagogical reasoning. It recommends the implementation of institutional AI literacy frameworks and clear guidelines for ethical integration in creative disciplines.
Downloads
Referências
Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, Article 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, Article 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential benefits and risks of AI integration in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., & Thorne, E. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34(1), Article 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 219, Article 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14679-14701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11819-x
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Selwyn, N. (2024). On the limits of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. Nordic Journal of Pedagogy and Critique, 10, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel? ChatGPT as a case study of using generative AI in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Matilda Quainoo

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.








