Bridging expert judgement and simulated evidence: A cross-validated iot technology stack for African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) fingerling survivability
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.51867/scimundi.6.2.26Mots-clés :
Aquaculture Sensors, African Catfish, Cloud Platforms, Edge Computing, Expert Survey, Internet of Things, Precision Aquaculture, Technology AssessmentRésumé
Selecting an appropriate Internet of Things (IoT) technology stack comprising sensors, actuators, connectivity technologies, edge-computing devices, and cloud platforms is a critical step in developing aquaculture monitoring systems, yet technology selection is often unsystematic. This challenge is particularly important in resource-constrained environments, where cost, power availability, and connectivity reliability constrain system deployment and operation. This study aimed to identify, evaluate, and validate an appropriate IoT technology stack for monitoring African catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell, 1822) fingerling survivability. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory research design was adopted, integrating quantitative expert-survey data with simulation-based evidence. First, a structured questionnaire was administered to 48 IoT experts, of whom 87.5% reported direct implementation experience. The questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.82). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and weighted rankings, to identify preferred sensors, actuators, connectivity technologies, edge devices, cloud platforms, and implementation priorities. Second, six simulation and prototyping platforms were comparatively evaluated against the requirements of aquaculture IoT development. Third, an independent 300-observation quasi-experimental simulation was conducted to examine the effects of key water-quality parameters on fingerling survivability. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate standardized sensitivity indices, which were subsequently compared with expert rankings for cross-validation. Dissolved oxygen sensors (16.79%), ammonia/nitrite sensors (14.18%), and temperature and pH sensors (11.57% each) received the highest expert rankings. For actuation, aerators and pumps (34.91%) and automated water-exchange systems (29.25%) received the highest rankings. Raspberry Pi Pico microcontrollers were identified as suitable edge-computing devices, with Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) recommended for device communication, Wi-Fi for relatively close-range deployments, and Global System for Mobile Communications/Long-Term Evolution (GSM/LTE) for remote sites. ThingSpeak and Blynk were identified as suitable cloud platforms for data management and visualization. The principal implementation challenges were security (21.88%), interoperability (20.83%), and power consumption (19.79%). The simulation produced sensitivity indices of 0.7875 for dissolved oxygen, 0.7620 for ammonia, and 0.5462 for temperature, corresponding to the parameters receiving the strongest expert endorsement. The convergence between expert rankings and simulation-derived sensitivity indices provides evidence of consistency between practitioner judgment and simulated system behavior. The study therefore proposes a low-cost IoT technology stack comprising dissolved-oxygen and ammonia sensors, aeration and water-exchange actuators, Raspberry Pi Pico edge devices, MQTT-based communication, and ThingSpeak/Blynk cloud platforms for resource-constrained aquaculture environments. Adoption of standardized communication protocols, secure data transmission using Transport Layer Security (TLS), and low-power hardware designs is recommended to address interoperability, security, and energy constraints. The methodological framework also provides a basis for combining expert assessment with simulation-based evidence when evaluating IoT technologies for precision aquaculture and related agricultural applications.
Téléchargements
Références
Ahmed, N., Ngadi, M. A., Almazroi, A. A., & Alghanmi, N. A. (2025). Hybrid model for novel attack detection using a cluster-based machine learning classification approach for the Internet of Things (IoT). Future Internet, 17(6), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17060251
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(4), 2347-2376. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095
Babalola, T. E., Babalola, A. D., & Goroti, A. V. (2024). Development of an IoT-based water quality monitoring device for domestic fish ponds. ABUAD Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 7(1), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.53982/ajerd.2024.0701.08-j
Biazi, V., & Marques, C. (2023). Industry 4.0-based smart systems in aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Aquacultural Engineering, 103, 102360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2023.102360
Blynk. (2021). Blynk: Low-code IoT software platform [Computer software]. https://blynk.io
Boeckl, K., Fagan, M., Fisher, W., Lefkovitz, N., Megas, K. N., Nadeau, E., O'Rourke, D. G., Piccarreta, B., & Scarfone, K. (2019). Considerations for managing Internet of Things (IoT) cybersecurity and privacy risks (NISTIR 8228). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8228
Boyd, C. E. (2015). Water quality: An introduction (2nd ed.). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17446-4
Chen, C.-H., Wu, Y.-C., Zhang, J.-X., & Chen, Y.-H. (2022). IoT-based fish farm water quality monitoring system. Sensors, 22(17), 6700. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176700
Cheruiyot, J. K., & Adhiaya, M. (2023). Adoption of aquaculture technologies and management practices, challenges and productivity of fish-ponds in Kakamega County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research, 22(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajfar/2023/v22i1563
Flores-Iwasaki, M., Guadalupe, G. A., Pachas-Caycho, M., Chapa-Gonza, S., Mori-Zabarburú, R. C., & Guerrero-Abad, J. C. (2025). Internet of Things (IoT) sensors for water quality monitoring in aquaculture systems: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. AgriEngineering, 7(3), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7030078
Ghafari, F., Shourangiz, E., & Wang, C. (2024). Cost effectiveness of the Industrial Internet of Things adoption in the U.S. manufacturing SMEs. Intelligent and Sustainable Manufacturing, 1(1), 10008. https://doi.org/10.35534/ism.2024.10008
Gowda, H. K. N., & Kader Jailani, M. A. (2023). Water Sense: IoT-based water quality monitoring system. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4(6), 4466-4470.
Idachaba, F. E., Olowoleni, J. O., Ibhaze, A. E., & Oni, O. O. (2017). IoT enabled real-time fishpond management system. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017 (Vol. 1, pp. 42-46). International Association of Engineers.
Islam, M. M., Kashem, M. A., Alyami, S. A., & Moni, M. A. (2023). Monitoring water quality metrics of ponds with IoT sensors and machine learning to predict fish species survival. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 102, 104930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2023.104930
Jais, N. A. M., Abdullah, A. F., Kassim, M. S. M., Karim, M. M. A., Abdulsalam, M., & Muhadi, N. 'A. (2024). Improved accuracy in IoT-based water quality monitoring for aquaculture tanks using low-cost sensors: Asian seabass fish farming. Heliyon, 10(8), e29022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29022
Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008
MathWorks. (2020). ThingSpeak IoT analytics platform [Computer software]. https://thingspeak.com
Mekki, K., Bajic, E., Chaxel, F., & Meyer, F. (2019). A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment. ICT Express, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2017.12.005
Ngugi, C. C., Bowman, J. R., & Omolo, B. O. (2007). A new guide to fish farming in Kenya. Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program.
Omambia, A., Wambua, A., Awuor, F. M., Maake, B., & Orina, P. (2025). An AI-driven IoT framework for aquaculture management. In IST-Africa 2025 Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.23919/IST-Africa67297.2025.11060535
Patel, K. K., & Patel, S. M. (2016). Internet of Things-IOT: Definition, characteristics, architecture, enabling technologies, application & future challenges. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 6(5), 6122-6131. https://doi.org/10.4010/2016.1482
Pathmudi, V. R., Khatri, N., Kumar, S., Abdul-Qawy, A. S. H., & Vyas, A. K. (2023). A systematic review of IoT technologies and their constituents for smart and sustainable agriculture applications. Scientific African, 19, e01577.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01577
Prapti, D. R., Mohamed Shariff, A. R., Che Man, H., Mohamed Ramli, N., Perumal, T., & Shariff, M. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT)-based aquaculture: An overview of IoT application on water quality monitoring. Reviews in Aquaculture, 14(2), 979-992. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12637
Rastegari, H., Nadi, F., Lam, S. S., Ikhwanuddin, M., Kasan, N. A., Rahmat, R. F., & Mahari, W. A. W. (2023). Internet of Things in aquaculture: A review of the challenges and potential solutions based on current and future trends. Smart Agricultural Technology, 4, 100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100187
Rodríguez, M. C. B., González, C. E. M., Almanza, E. D. C., Rodríguez, C. G., Regino-Vergara, J. Á., & López-Padilla, A. (2025). Benefits and challenges of the Internet of Things in aquaculture production: A literature review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1590153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1590153
Serepas, F., Papias, I., Christakis, K., Dimitropoulos, N., & Marinakis, V. (2025). Lightweight embedded IoT gateway for smart homes based on an ESP32 microcontroller. Computers, 14(9), 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14090391
Sharma, K., & Shivandu, S. K. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence and Internet of Things (IoT) for enhanced crop monitoring and management in precision agriculture. Sensors International, 5, 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2024.100292
Shete, R. P., Bongale, A. M., & Dharrao, D. (2024). IoT-enabled effective real-time water quality monitoring method for aquaculture. MethodsX, 13, 102906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102906
Wibisono, A. B., & Jayadi, R. (2024). Experimental IoT system to maintain water quality in catfish pond. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(3), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150340
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Samuel Khayo Shitote, Jasper Ondulo, Collins Odoyo 2026

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.








