A pragmatic analysis of the discursive strategies used in Mwalimu Andrew's staffroom diary texts

https://doi.org/10.51867/scimundi.5.2.19

Authors

Keywords:

Argumentation, Discursive Strategies, Perspectivation, Predication, Referential Nomination

Abstract

The Staffroom Diary by Mwalimu Andrew is a satirical and humorous text featured in the Sunday Nation that provides readers with insights into the experiences, observations, and contemplations of a fictional teacher persona. Its popularity as a lighthearted commentary has greatly aided in the exposure of serious and diverse issues through language. This paper analyzes the discursive strategies utilized in Mwalimu Andrew's Staffroom Diary texts. The study employed Critical Discourse Analysis theory (CDA) by Fairclough. The study adopted a qualitative research approach and employed a descriptive textual analysis design to examine linguistic and discursive features in Mwalimu Andrew’s Staffroom Diary texts. Systematic sampling was used to select the first column every month for a period of one year (2023). The findings indicated that Mwalimu Andrew utilizes discursive strategies, including referential nomination, argumentation, predication, perspectivation, and intensification, to clarify social roles and power dynamics among characters in the school context. The study established that writers use discursive strategies to shape readers’ and audiences’ perceptions of social roles. These strategies do more than entertain; they communicate and reinforce social realities, establish group identities, and celebrate leadership. This implies that speakers and writers should be cognizant of the fact that their language choices and repertoires of varieties in language use, while communicating diverse realities, can reinforce or challenge existing social hierarchies and cultural norms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Dimensions

Addae, D. (2020). Learning behind bars: Motivations and challenges of learners in a correctional facility in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101650

Alnasser, A. A. M. (2023). Argumentation and persuasion in Saudi TEDx talks: A political discourse analysis approach (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).

Birner, B. J. (2025). Introduction to pragmatics. John Wiley & Sons.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cruz, M. P. (2015). Pragmatics and discourse analysis. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 6(5), 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1463

Curcó, C. (2020). Relevance theory and the analysis of media discourse. In Pragmatics of Media Discourse (pp. 21-40). De Gruyter.

Donohue, W., & Hamilton, M. (2022). A framework for understanding polarizing language. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Persuasion (pp. 207-223). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367823658-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367823658-14

Ellis, D. G. (1999). From language to communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603685

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193-217.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis in researching language in the new capitalism: Overdetermination, transdisciplinarity and textual analysis. In Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 281-300). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Fetzer, A. (2018). The pragmatics of political discourse: Explorations across cultures. John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.03fet DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.03fet

Githiora, C. J. (2018). Sheng: Rise of a Kenyan Swahili vernacular. Boydell & Brewer. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787443754

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ntfvm DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ntfvm

Hansson, S. (2015). Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 297-322.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564736

Hutcheon, L. (1994). Irony's edge: The theory and politics of irony. Psychology Press.

Itieba, J. L., Mudogo, B., & Barasa, D. (2023). Contextual frames of reference in the translation of George Orwell's Animal Farm to Kiswahili. Translation Studies: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.46991/TSTP/2023.3.2.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46991/TSTP/2023.3.2.029

Khafaga, A. (2023). Strategic lexicalization in courtroom discourse: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2217585. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2217585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2217585

Khalayi, R. (2014). The use of humour in socio-political commentary in Mwalimu Andrew's Staffroom Diary (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Koski, J. E., Xie, H., & Olson, I. R. (2015). Understanding social hierarchies: The neural and psychological foundations of status perception. Social Neuroscience, 10(5), 527-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1013223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1013223

Kumar, D. (2022). Style and stylistic in linguistic: A critical overview. Journal of Language and Linguistics in Society (JLLS), 2(5), 57-63.

https://doi.org/10.55529/jlls.25.57.63 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jlls.25.57.63

Mudogo, B. A. (2017). Word level strategies used to attain functional Lukabras equivalence in the translation of Mulembe FM Luhya newscasts (Doctoral dissertation, Maseno University).

Ogola, G. O. (2004). Stirring whispers: Fictionalising the "popular" in the Kenyan newspaper (Doctoral dissertation).

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination. Routledge.

Sengul, K. (2019). Critical discourse analysis in political communication research: A case study of right-wing populist discourse in Australia. Communication Research and Practice, 5(4), 376-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1695082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1695082

Shashkova, V. N. (2019). The semantic fields within the conceptual field "Crime Scene Examination": Semantics, nomination, reference. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 4(20), 45-48.

Sultan, S., & Rapi, M. (2020). Positive discourse analysis of the Indonesian government spokesperson's discursive strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(4), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-14

Thomas, L., & Wareing, S. (2004). Language, society and power: An introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426968

Van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics. Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, 43, 27-65.

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.43.03van DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.43.03van

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001

Wandere, D. O. (2021). Gender, sexual variations and sexual rights: The African challenge. Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(11), 38-52.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2(1), 1-33.

Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2015). Discourse and racism. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 576-596). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch27

Yus, F. (2016). Humour and relevance. John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4

Zotzmann, K., & O'Regan, J. P. (2016). Critical discourse analysis and identity. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity (pp. 113-127). Routledge.

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Lumosi, L. A., Atichi, R. A., & Mandilla, L. (2025). A pragmatic analysis of the discursive strategies used in Mwalimu Andrew’s staffroom diary texts. SCIENCE MUNDI, 5(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.51867/scimundi.5.2.19