Effect of Beneficiary Participation on Project Performance: A Case of an HIV Peer Education Project in Gicumbi District, Rwanda

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/scimundi.4.1.8

Keywords:

Beneficial Participation, Implementation, Monitoring, Peer Education, Project Performance, Project Planning

Abstract

The HIV/AIDS pandemic remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the prevalence rates are among the highest in the world. This study investigated the impact of beneficiary participation on the performance of an HIV peer education program implemented by the Rwanda Network of People Living with HIV (RRP+) in Gicumbi District from 2017 to 2020. Researchers examined three specific areas: project planning, implementation, and monitoring. Stakeholder and Engagement Theory alongside Participation Theory were reviewed. The study adopted a descriptive research design with qualitative and quantitative approaches. The total study population for this research was be 3,938 that included Recipients of Care (RoC) and stakeholders directly involved in the HIV peer education project implemented by the Rwanda Network of People Living with HIV (RRP+) in Gicumbi District, Rwanda, from 2017 to 2020. A mixed sampling approach was employed to select participants for this research. This approach involves a combination of probability and non-probability sampling methods. Therefore, the sample size calculated using the Yamane formula was 387 Recipients of Care (RoC) and stakeholders. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. Findings indicated significant beneficiary involvement in strategic planning and annual plans, with mean scores of 3.78 and 3.50, respectively, on a 1-4 scale. Moderate familiarity with the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) (average 3.22) was observed. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant positive impact on Project Performance (p < 0.05). Beneficiaries reported satisfactory healthcare and psychosocial support (mean score 0.99) and moderate satisfaction with supportive supervision (mean score 1.62). Capacity-building (average 1.02) showed room for improvement, yet still had a significant positive influence on Project Performance (p < 0.05). Limited involvement in monitoring (mean score 1.04) was observed, with high satisfaction in feedback meetings (mean score 4.15). Feedback acceptability (average 3.42) indicated moderate acceptability, also positively impacting Project Performance (p < 0.05). The positive unstandardized coefficient (B) of 0.398 indicate that increased healthcare and psychosocial support are associated with higher project performance. The positive unstandardized coefficient (B) of 0.026 suggest that supportive supervision has a relatively positive relationship with project performance. The positive unstandardized coefficient (B) of 0.293 highlight the importance of training beneficiaries during project implementation. The study recommended foster greater beneficiary involvement in project planning by conducting regular consultations, workshops, and feedback sessions. Review and refine the supportive supervision approach to address the varying levels of satisfaction among beneficiaries. Maintain regular and productive feedback meetings to capture beneficiary input and concerns. Enhance feedback collection and analysis processes to ensure feedback is incorporated into project activities effectively. Form a strengthened system of monitoring and evaluation in order to consistently evaluate performance of project as well as adapt to evolving requirements of the beneficiary. Additionally, formulate models of sustainability to ascertain that  favorable and positive impacts of the project are preserved after its overall completion.

References

Amy, O. S., Medley, M. M., Kennedy, C. E., O'Reilly, K. R., & Sweat, M. D. (2009). Effectiveness of Peer Education Interventions for HIV Prevention in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21(3), 181-206. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2009.21.3.181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2009.21.3.181

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-224.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Binagwaho, A., Farmer, P. E., Nsanzimana, S., Karema, C., Gasana, M., de Dieu Ngirabega, J., & Nyatanyi, T. (2014). Rwanda 20 years on: Investing in life. The Lancet, 384(9940), 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60574-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60574-2

Bredillet, C. N., Tywoniak, S., & Dwivedula, R. (2018). Stakeholder participation and project success: Toward an empirical research agenda. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 526-542.

Bredillet, C., Yatim, F., & Ruiz, P. (2018). Benefits management and stakeholder participation in mega-projects: Exploring their interactions. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 53-67.

Buchanan, D. R., Miller, F. G., Wallerstein, N., & Gamble, V. N. (2017). Ethical issues in community-based participatory research: Balancing rigorous research with community participation in community intervention studies. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 11(3), 283-293.

Condo, J., Mugeni, C., Naughton, B., Hall, K., Tuazon, M. A., Omwega, A., ... & Binagwaho, A. (2014). Rwanda's evolving community health worker system: a qualitative assessment of client and provider perspectives. Human resources for health, 12, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-71

Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.

Giramata, J., Shukla, M., & Eugene, M. (2016). The effect of beneficiaries' participation in project monitoring and evaluation on project success: A case of KWAMP project, Kirehe District, Rwanda. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(3), 450-463.

Haberer, J. E., Sabin, L., Amico, K. R., Orrell, C., Galárraga, O., Tsai, A. C., Vreeman, R. C., Wilson, I., Sam-Agudu, N. A., Blaschke, T. F., Vrijens, B., Mellins, C. A., Remien, R. H., Weiser, S. D., Lowenthal, E., Stirratt, M. J., Sow, P. S., Thomas, B., Ford, N., Mills, E., … Bangsberg, D. R. (2017). Improving antiretroviral therapy adherence in resource-limited settings at scale: a discussion of interventions and recommendations. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 20(1), 21371. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21371

Havugimana, A. (2015). Beneficiaries' participation in design and performance of the Survivors Integration Project of Avega Agahozo in Gasabo District, Rwanda (Unpublished Research Project, Rwanda).

Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., & Carr, C. L. (2018). Project success: A literature review and future prospects. Project Management Journal, 49(3), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818776152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818776152

Khan, M. A., & Bhatti, T. (2014). The impact of stakeholder participation on project success: A study of construction industry of Pakistan. Management Research Review, 37(10), 897-918.

Koen, J., Amin, A., Fielding, K., Grant, A. D., Lombard, C., Mthiyane, T., & Mcingana, M. (2018). Peer-led HIV/AIDS prevention among rural secondary school students in Zimbabwe. AIDS Education and Prevention, 20(5), 435-447.

Mbui, J. N. (2018). Influence of community participation on project performance: a case of Ruiri water projects, Meru county, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Miller, A. N., Mutungi, M., Facchini, E., Barasa, B., Ondieki, W., & Warria, C. (2018). An outcome assessment of an ABC-based HIV peer education intervention among Kenyan university students. Journal of Health Communication, 13(4), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802063470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802063470

Nkurunziza, A., Van Endert, N., Bagirisano, J., Hitayezu, J. B., Dewaele, S., Tengera, O., & Jans, G. (2020). Breaking barriers in the prevention of adolescent pregnancies for in-school children in Kirehe district (Rwanda): a mixed-method study for the development of a peer education program on sexual and reproductive health. Reproductive Health, 17, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00986-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00986-9

Ruwa, M. C. (2016). The influence of stakeholder participation on the performance of donor funded projects: a case of Kinango integrated food security and livelihood project (KIFSLP), Kwale County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

Serap, A. T., Bulduk, S., & Erdogan, S. (2012). The effect of HIV/STI peer education on reducing risky sexual behaviors among Turkish university students. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care, 11(5), 310-314.

Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. C. (2016). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 1-10.

UNAIDS. (2021). Terminology guidelines. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2015_terminology_guidelines_en.pdf

Weiss, C. (1995). Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory: Exploring Theory-Based Evaluation for Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts (pp. 65-92). The Aspen Institute.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-15

How to Cite

Tugirimana, J. B., & Dushimimana, J. D. D. (2024). Effect of Beneficiary Participation on Project Performance: A Case of an HIV Peer Education Project in Gicumbi District, Rwanda. SCIENCE MUNDI, 4(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.51867/scimundi.4.1.8